Archive for January, 2010
Quote of the Week: Change
Posted by: | CommentsPeople change and forget to tell each other. ~Lillian Hellman
Cooking Dinner. Not.
Posted by: | CommentsSo, how bad is it that I just. don’t. want. to. prepare. dinner. anymore?
Moms around the world, I salute you. Cooking every night for a family must be a grind like none other. I am starting to feel your pain.
For first few years Husband and I were married, it was kinda cool. Finding fun new recipes, cooking for two, sitting down together. But, lately, I just haven’t felt like it. Call it cooking burnout. Or, food fatigue.
Most nights we’ve been munching before the TV on whatever I can throw together from the fridge and pantry.
Husband can cook, when he feels like it. But, I don’t see him stepping up to the stove in my absence. If I don’t make something, he’ll settle (happily) for a bowl of cereal.
If I had my druthers, I’d just do what I did when single – not eat at all or grab something on the way home. (See: Does marriage make you fatter? Why, yes, it does.)
My cooking doldrums have been going on for two months now. And, my motivation is getting weaker every day. Stopping at the grocery story on the way home to pick up prepared food isn’t giving me a thrill. In fact, grocery shopping on any level is too much.
We dine out more now. But, it gets expensive.
What I really want is for the food to just magically appear. I’ve looked into private chef service. Pricey.
So, I suggested Husband cook at least one night a week. His answer? That’s possible.
Possible or probable? I replied. He laughed.
I’d have to give it a try and see, was his answer.
Somehow I think this idea isn’t going to go anywhere.
Husbands around the world – who have wives who cook regularly – take note. Say something nice to your partner at the dinner table tonight. You never know when it’s going to end.
An Unexpected Upside of Sleeping With Someone
Posted by: | CommentsWe have been having some strange weather in Virginia. This basically puts us in the “normal” weather category as the rest of the country does battle with the elements, as well.
First, there was the Big Snow Storm the week before Christmas. It rarely snows where I live in Virginia, so we were paralyzed with 27 inches of the white stuff for days. (We still have a little patch of snow on our front lawn.)
Then, there was last night. It rained so hard I honestly was worried about the birds. I mean, where do they go when the heavens unleash a fire hose? I’m surprised our windows are still intact, and part of me wondered if my car’s windshield was going to be caved in this morning.
I, of course, posed some of these questions to Husband in the middle of the night. I was awake anyway. (Who can sleep through a gale force?) I asked: What’s going on? Should we be worried? Husband, who consulted the Weather Channel earlier in the evening, remained nonplussed. Apparently, knowing that the weather is coming is calming. I continued to worry about the birds.
Regularly I consult Husband on such nightly matters. What was that? is a common question when I hear something. As someone who cannot, under any circumstance, watch movies about home invasion or other such violence, I immediately think someone is breaking in. Husband replies the same each night. It’s just the house. Our townhouse is still “settling.”
But, it’s nice to have someone to ask when your thoughts are running amuck in the dark. I distinctly remember living in Northern Virginia during my single days. I lived very close to Washington, DC, and was constantly convinced that someone was breaking in when I heard a noise in the dark. Of course, 99 percent of the time this was my mind playing tricks on me. (The fact someone did try to kick in my door one afternoon while I was home did not add to my comfort level. I moved from NoVa about five months later.)
So, while I have complained about having to share my sleeping space with someone, I must add something to the “pro” category. Having someone to ask What was that? when the house settles is kinda nice. Even when they can’t do anything about windows blowing in from torrential storms, it is good to know I won’t be alone when it happens.
Quote of the Week: Limo
Posted by: | CommentsLots of people want to ride with you in the limo, but what you want is someone who will take the bus with you when the limo breaks down. ~Oprah Winfrey
Married Thoughts Versus Single Thoughts
Posted by: | CommentsThere are a number of thoughts I have now as a married person, that I am quite certain I did not think when I was single.
What should we have for dinner? That’s one.
Another is please, please, please let the dishes in the dishwasher be dirty. This is because I just want to throw in that spoon and not worry about it. (Admit it, you have this thought.) If they are clean, well, then someone has to unload them. I hate unloading the dishwasher. Guess who unloads the most? When single, I could go a whole month without having to do that deed. Or, just wash them again. What the heck.
Another consideration is how can I get Husband away from that computer to the dinner table? Yes, I have become that woman, the one who yells up the stairs, dinner is ready in 10 minutes. Then, I yell, 5 minutes. And, then I spend the next 15 minutes actually trying to tear him away from his office before the chicken parmesan I’ve prepared gets cold.
Others include:
Do I have time to go to the gym after work before Husband gets home?
Has that towel been used?
Hmm, I wonder if Husband will leave first tomorrow morning and I should pull into the driveway first. But, then I might want to go the gym. Naaa, I should just pull in so he can pull in behind me. But, then again he might take that conference call tomorrow from home and then…
Should I put a note on that cheese (do not eat)?
I was here first, so hands off the remote.
Should I put a note on that dark chocolate (don’t you dare eat)?
Will he remember about my dance class tonight so he has to fend for himself for dinner (even though I’ve been going to this same class for three years now)?
Do we need milk? (But, only when I’m standing in milk aisle of the grocery store. When I was single, I always knew what was in the refrigerator. Nothing.)
Like that.
And, then, of course there is when are you coming home? I miss you.
LBB Launches a Facebook Fan Page
Posted by: | CommentsHere comes a moment of self consciousness. I have launched a Facebook Fan page for Late Bloomer Bride. Yes, I’m blushing.
If you are interested in checking it out, please visit http://www.facebook.com/pages/Late-Bloomer-Bride/258250368774
Or, simply search for “Late Bloomer Bride” in your Facebook page search box.
Thanks for the consideration. I will try to be interesting.
Book Recommendation, Part I: Committed by Elizabeth Gilbert
Posted by: | CommentsRecently someone said to me, you’re awfully obsessed with your marital status. Well, if you read this blog, I am sure it seems that way.
The truth is I am involved in a lot of different things. But, they aren’t nearly as interesting to blog about.
In truth, this commentator was partly right. I am paying attention to my relationship with Husband. I am trying to be a mindful wife. (Please forgive the awful pop reference. I know it’s bad.) But, I want to be good at marriage. I want Husband to be good at it, too (not that he isn’t).
This may be why I read so many books on the subject.
A few books I’ve read, I was sad to see end. Love in the Time of Cholera by Gabriel Garcia Marquez. High Fidelity
by Nick Hornby. Eat, Pray, Love
by Elizabeth Gilbert.
Gilbert’s latest book, Committed, is turning out that way, too.
First – just to get it out of the way — if you are interested in relationships, you must buy this book. By page ten, I read some things I hadn’t heard before. That’s reason enough in my book (bad pun).
I am just 103 pages into Committed (182 pages to go). By page five, I wanted to put it down and start blogging about how it was affecting me and my perspective as a later-in-life married person.
By the first 100 pages or so, Gilbert has explained the premise of the book: she and her partner, Felipe, were “forced” to get married due to his visa status. Thanks to increasing homeland security, he could not (at the point in time she is referencing) enter the U.S. again until he was married to an American. Given that they both had devastating divorces in their past, they were loathe to tie the knot again with anyone. They had promised everlasting, unmarried love prior to the run in with our border officials. But, as she writes, they loved each other enough to get married to each other so they could live together.
But, she knew that promising to marry him so they could stay together would not be enough to keep the past marital demons at bay. This book is really about her journey to make peace with the institution of marriage.
Amen, sister. I wish I had your book five years ago.
Gilbert’s ruminations on marriage and its expectations fascinated me. I ended up underlining so many parts – and even reading parts aloud to Husband (much to his chagrin) – I knew I was going to have to blog about this book in pieces. Hence, my stopping at page 103 to ruminate.
We all know that romantic love is a universal human experience. Yet, we mess it up so often. Heaven help us.
Turns out, though, Heaven wasn’t in the picture in early days.
Gilbert writes that in early Christianity, marriage wasn’t considered particularly divine. Christian leaders found marriage to involve sex, and that just wouldn’t do. She then goes on to write about how much marriage has changed in the last few millennia – its acceptance, its place in religion, its importance to society and the changes around who you are allowed to marry (from race to sexual preference). And, this malleability is key to How We Might Have Gotten Here To Today’s Marriage State.
I admit I have a special place in my heart for this malleability. For one, the fact I got married for the first time at age 42 no longer made me a spinster who finally made good (as it would have been labeled a hundred years ago). Rather, I now am considered an independent woman who is simply called a late bloomer when it comes to romantic union. A much nicer label, don’t you think?
But, then, perhaps we LBBs are really less strange and less special than we think. Perhaps we are just one subgroup in Today’s Marriage State, which is ever evolving and changing rapidly in today’s world.
Certain changes have reminded me that the relationship challenges I face, are child’s play. I could have been forced to marry a cousin to keep the family jewels in the fold, like so many women were forced to do 400 years ago.
Today’s ability to follow one’s heart instead is the norm. Often that doesn’t even include marriage. In Sweden, for instance, marriage is a diminishing trend. Today, I could even marry a woman. Gay marriage – unthinkable 100 years ago – is gaining rising acceptance. And interracial marriage – also a point of angst among conservatives just a mere 40 years ago, is no biggie today.
Regardless of its form, coupling is here to stay. But, apparently, we aren’t any better at it today, than we were 1,000 years ago. The reasons for it – and the rules — have just changed.
Gilbert talks about infatuation a lot in the first 100 pages – how some of us (her past self included) chose love impetuously, based on chemistry, lust and desires. Oh, yeah, like I don’t know that one.
It made me think, perhaps we LBBs really are recovering infatuation addicts. Maybe those of us who married later in life just finally woke up and made a decision on a mate based on something we hadn’t thought of before – stop making chemistry everything and start seeing a real person. Maybe, just maybe, we broke an infatuation cycle.
(I say this because, if I’m really honest and think about it hard enough, I know now that Husband didn’t deserve the 25 year old me. He deserved someone better, and I needed to grow up before he could even recognize me as mate material. So, there may be truth to this infatuation cycle.)
Gilbert also writes much about expectations we have of our mate once together – with or without the infatuation part. And, how that may be the enemy of our happiness. Just like what This Emotional Life said, perhaps we are asking too much of the marriage institution.
How did it go from protecting family assets (marrying cousins) to “you must complete me?”
Well, she follows the trail.
Gilbert muses, while we are now free to follow our heart’s yearnings to marry a soulmate (and all that implies), we actually have become a slave to finding that perfect one.
Maybe that’s why we LBBs sometimes struggle with merging. We waited a long time, and our expectations are high. When our spouse reveals his humanity, we aren’t always so glad to see it.
Gilbert also discusses the flip side of being able to choose someone your heart said “this is the one.” The ability to get in and out, at a whim. Having so much choice about who, where, when and how you may marry means you are free to seek out a soulmate — and when they turn out to be “just human,” well, next! That can be some heady stuff. The urge to run for the hills is strong, given how the media portrays “perfect love.”
I am eager to now read page 104. So, I’ll get back to you. I really need to finish this book.
My Three Year Secret: A Fan, A Dance, A Little Romance
Posted by: | CommentsThere comes a time in every relationship when the romance really does leave the building. It takes work to keep the fires going at home.
At first, everything is all wine and roses. Boy cannot get enough of girl. Boy is insatiable. Girl is flattered. Boy and girl promise each other it will never change. But, then, boy has to leave the house one day and go to work. And, then Girl decides to go to bed early one night. Boy decides to stay up late. It all starts to unravel slowly as real life, and its demands, begin to take precedence over mooning over each other.
Bummer.
Psychologists have a word for getting used to something to the point that it doesn’t impact you in the same way. It’s called Hedonic Adaptation. Apparently, we humans are brilliant at this.
In the PBS special, This Emotional Life: Rethinking Happiness, the final part in a three-part series, scientists talk about this. They have discovered the things that make us happy one day, won’t necessarily make us happy the next. We grow used to things. Easily. So, we are, as human beings, always seeking new sources of joy and fulfillment. (Apparently, one way to combat this hedonic adaptation is to cut back on luxurious enjoyment – to make things “treats” versus every day occurances.)
Strike one against craving the same person every day, at the same level.
Strike two on keeping romance alive at home is how society isn’t always that kind to women after a certain age, which dings her confidence tremendously.
When a woman turns 40 she is expected to act like a “mature adult” – whatever that means. Mini-skirts, giggling in public, and any reference at all to a sexual life are meant to be closeted away, never to be seen or heard from again. All this “act your age” talk is really saying “put it away. No one wants to see that.” It’s our society’s little dirty secret. We want to asexualize our older women.
(The “older part” also cracks me up. Because really, if you are going to live to be 90 – which many, many people alive today are going to do – 40 isn’t even half way. How is that old? Shouldn’t 70 – 80 be considered old? And, 40 still be considered adolescence?)
Ah, we are a fickle species.
For Husband and me, we try to buck the trends. While I don’t bother with mini-skirts anymore, I did kind of believe I wouldn’t fall into the trap of feeling like I had to “behave” so much once I turned 40. Ha.
The realization hit after being married for just one year that we were just like every other couple out there. The dreaded cliché of “marriage kills mystery and sexual intrigue” really was a fact.
Fortunately, late bloomer brides bring a number of skills to the marital table – and an independent, can-do attitude is usually one of them. We are do-ers. We’ve had to be.
So, I immediately had the thought that any mature woman of the 21st century might have: I can change this.
I headed out to bring romance behind closed doors. The usuals – more lingerie, more playtime, more whatever.
Then, Oprah intervened. (She’s such a troublemaker, that one.) She had a show in which everyday women were taking exotic dance lessons to lend a little spice to their life.
So, I did the 21st century thing. I googled it. Guess what? Right here, in my own little town, there was a professional dance studio that offered it. All of it – burlesque, striptease, bellydancing, pole dancing, chair dancing, as well as traditional, ballroom dancing.
I registered immediately. It’s been three years now. I am not the same woman.
Recently, someone in my social sphere who discovered my dancing, asked me (and with a serious amount of judgment in her tone, I might add), why would you do that? I readied a speech about empowerment, fitness, increasing body confidence, adding romantic spice to my relationship, developing grace and poise – all the things the dance students truthfully will tell you they have received from learning how to spin, pose, undulate and shimmy.
But, then I decided to tell her the real, real truth. It’s fun.
I started with pole dancing. It seemed the most taboo at the time, and I wanted something drastic. No dilly-dallying around here.
Besides, who would know? All the dance classes are locked down pretty tightly – curtains drawn, doors locked, no men or observers allowed. (Even the male co-owner of the studio isn’t allowed in.) And, if you run into any of your fellow dancers in public, they never, ever let on how you know each other. There is an unspoken oath amongst us.
The women’s ages range from 18 to 76 (no kidding). They come from every background you can imagine. In fact, one of the instructors has a Ph.D. in neuroscience (no kidding). And, their reasons vary from wanting to add a little spice to their life to fitness. One woman lost 20 pounds (no kidding). And, there was no more skin showing than what you’d see around a public American family swimming pool – in fact you’d see more there.
One of my favorite fellow students is in her 70s. “R” has been pole dancing for several years now. She can do a “pull up” on the pole – meaning pull her entire body weight up off the floor with the mere strength of her arms. She’ll tell you that she’s much stronger now than she was when she was in her 60s. Her husband agrees. She is my idol.
When I first started taking these dance classes, I told no one. Husband didn’t even know. I liked having a secret – and thought somehow through osmosis this secret would leak itself into our romantic life. He knew I was taking a class, but didn’t know which kind. I would come home and rub arnica oil onto bruised legs from attempting to spin around this one-inch-in-diameter steel pole and crawl around the floor in an attempt to look, well, graceful.
Side note: Anyone who thinks pole dancing is for women who don’t have any other skills has never tried to fling their body around said steel dowel and tried to make it look good. The women who are really into this – for sport and dance, not men’s entertainment – are serious athletes. Take a look.
Husband would watch my arnica-oil ritual and ask, What kind of class are you taking?
Oh, just a dance class.
Well, be careful.
Then I took a striptease exotic class. Wow. I learned a routine. I decided to “out” myself with Husband. Forget the secret osmosis. I showed him what I learned.
[[The next section has been deleted for your protection. It might melt your computer screen.]]
Introduce more romantic fire into our life? Check.
Then, I started exploring more. Enter burlesque.
Burlesque is flirty, prance-y and a not-at-all serious form of striptease dancing. It’s almost little girl like, twirling and all. The idea is to tease and show off, but never, ever show too much. You won’t see any naked burlesque dancers – just shiny, glittery, feathery costumes. That’s half the fun.
In class each week we would shimmy, shake, and fling boas around until the floor was so littered with feathers it looked like a chicken had exploded – albeit a multicolored, punk rock chicken.
At some point, our instructor introduced Fan work. I am now a fan addict.
Today, I am the proud owner of my very own 50 inch, regulation Sally Rand, black and hot pink, ostrich feather fan. I love this thing.
If our townhouse were to burn down, I would be sure to grab three things besides Husband: my laptop, my Ipod and the fan. Husband has strict instructions to do the same, if I’m not at home when the flames start.
I now have tried just about everything they offer at the dance studio. The interesting thing is – while the romantic benefits of being able to dance for – or let’s say, entertain — Husband turned out as you can imagine – something else happened.
For one, I have made some really great friends. The women I’ve met at the studio are the most inspiring, generous, compassionate people I’ve ever met. They want nothing more than for you – and everyone around them – to feel good about themselves, to feel graceful and beautiful, to feel ageless. It is the least judgmental space I have ever encountered, hands down.
But, something else big happened.
Being a late bloomer has terrific benefits – if you are paying attention. You can avoid other’s mistakes, for one. But, it also can come with doubts, a sense of feeling behind, and – since society says there are certain age for certain things – sometimes make you feel you’ve completely missed out on your time.
For me, these classes gave me something much more than a boost in the bedroom. It really turned out to be about the complete and utter annihilation of the thought that I am too old for, well, anything. And, there aren’t many places in the world that foster that.
It’s ironic really. There you are doing something with your body (and I can’t do half the things that some of the younger women can do), which is usually the first thing that signals your age. Yet, when dancing, age disappears.
I am sure there are people out there reading this thinking, come on, aren’t you proliferating the objectification of women? Isn’t there something else you could do, like read a book, go into therapy, take more ballroom dancing, or continue to watch Oprah’s shows on how age doesn’t really matter, to deal with these issues?
I tried all those. They weren’t nearly as much fun. (Plus, I don’t think a therapist would appreciate me sitting on his or her couch waving a 50 inch ostrich feather fan.)
During an extraordinarily busy time, I once threatened to reduce the amount of time I spent dancing. Husband was honestly concerned. Husband likes to see my routines. But, he will regularly say, to those friends who know of this extracurricular activity, that it really isn’t about him. It’s about me and the other women. He just gets a little side benefit action from time to time. He sees how it makes me happy.
Of course, that doesn’t stop Husband from asking, learn any new dance moves?
Why, yes, I have. Wanna see? Let me go get my fan…
P.S. Husband is a very private and conservative guy. He has nixed a few LBB blog posts in the past. This post, however, was suggested by Husband. He thought my readers should know about the power of this dance program and the contributions it has made to our life and countless of other women’s lives.
Quote of the Week: Assumptions
Posted by: | CommentsAssumptions are the termites of relationships. ~Henry Winkler
TIVO Was Supposed To Answer All Our Prayers
Posted by: | CommentsI will never catch up to Husband. His television watching, that is. I am so hopelessly behind now, I don’t know even where to begin.
We have two DVRs and two TVs. One “set” resides in the living room and the other in the bedroom. This means nothing need ever be missed.
However, having equipment does not guarantee the user plays by all the rules.
And, just because you can record, does it mean you should? If you do record, are you obligated to then view?
How about synching your TV watching moods with your spouse, now that you have a library from which to choose?
And, is he allowed to hit “play” on a recorded show without you? Or should Husband and I reconcile our TV watching schedules, which is ironic since the whole reason we got the DVR(s) in the first place was so we wouldn’t be a servant to a schedule?
While we have been liberated from being a slave to TV time schedules, we have now been introduced to a new kind of dilemma. And, it all comes down to the fact I dare to go to bed before Husband.
You see, in addition to the shows we record because we’re just not home, we record anything on after 9 p.m. I need my beauty sleep, and would rather read before bed anyway. I figure I can watch later. Husband – still alive and kicking until at least 11 p.m. – refuses to wait if something good is on. I mean, why should he, really?
But, then, the next night (or so) I want to watch what I missed. Husband laments he’s already seen it. And, of course, now there is something else good to watch – it being a new night, and all.
So, now, the shows pile up on our DVRs, waiting for a Saturday when I get plow through four to five shows at once.
(You’ve got to love the ability to forward right through all those commercials. It’s interesting that a 30 minute show is really just 22 minutes long. And, I can get through an hour show in about 45 minutes. Makes you believe all that stuff about TV watching really sucking time from your life. I mean if you watch three shows in one night, that’s at least 45 minutes of commercials you’re wasting your time on. But, I digress…)
Also, when this far behind, you also have to deal with the existential dilemma of trying to figure out what to catch up on, first.
Do, I catch up on Heroes? (Because Husband will not wait for me on that show. No way. No, sir.) Or, do I turn to Fringe or Leverage, first? Then, there is Dr. Oz and Oprah (dozens of those). Oh, and let us not forget all those cool Discovery, PBS and History channel shows about what would happen if humans suddenly disappeared from the earth and how Vikings have really gotten a bad rap all these years.
Makes me wonder if we could add to the marriage contract, Thou shall not sally forth with TV watching without spouse. Or, maybe I’ll just go read a book.

